Legal Opinion

Wittstein v. Keenan

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided February 15, 1951No. File No. 42465PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff has brought this action to recover the sum of $2000 alleged to have been paid over by him to one of the defendants as a deposit on the purchase price of property located in North Haven. As drawn, the complaint is in two counts. The gist of the first count is that no written agreement was entered into between the plaintiff as buyer and the defendants as owners and that the plaintiff is entitled to the return of the deposit, which has been refused upon demand. The gist of the second count is that the defendant (Mrs. Keenan) to whom the deposit had been paid represented that the cellar…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Santoro v. MackSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  2. Sallies v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
  3. Utley v. NolanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  4. Dwyer v. RedmondSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  5. Lowe v. KohnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sovereign Bank v. LicataConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  2. Keir v. TanguayConnecticut Superior Court · 1956
  3. Keir v. TanguayPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API