Legal Opinion

Reddell v. O'Fiel

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided May 16, 1928No. 1100-5010PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNickels, J.

The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals is reported at page 142 et seq. of 298 S. W. and to it we refer for a general statement of the case.

Defendants in error requested (and the trial judge refused) submission of this “issue” :

“Did W. L. Reddell, in the presence of his wife, Ada Reddell, after the $1,000 was deposited with David E. O’Eiel, and before the trials of the prosecutions against W. L. Reddell and Ada Reddell were had and disposed of, agree with David E. O’Eiel that the $1,000 should *93be held until said eases were disposed of, and that defendants” (i. e. O’Fiel et al.) “should…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Garitty v. RaineyTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Poindexter v. Receivers of the Kirby Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Gosch v. VranaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Lake v. Jones Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Lewis v. PittsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. MoranCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  2. Thompson v. First Methodist Episcopal ChurchTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  3. Norvell Service Company v. SpellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  4. Norvell Service Company v. SpellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API