Legal Opinion

Farmah v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 15, 1994No. 622-90, 623-90PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*676 OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

OVERSTREET, Judge.

A jury convicted appellant of aggravated sexual assault and assessed punishment at thirty years imprisonment. The trial court found appellant guilty of aggravated robbery and assessed punishment at five years imprisonment. The Court of Appeals affirmed both convictions. Farmah v. State, 789 S.W.2d 665 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st] 1990). This court granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review.1

The complainant was abducted in West University at gunpoint by two males who forced her into a car driven by a third male.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Cassias v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Woodward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Tarpley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Ramos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  2. Amador v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  3. Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1998
  4. Rodriquez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1996
  5. Weems v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API