Legal Opinion

Bolling v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided January 16, 1962No. Docket Nos. 89505, 89506, 89507, 89508Published

Petitioners, operating as a partnership, strip mined coal under a lease agreement and mining contract with the owner of the mineral rights. The agreement described certain named coal seams and obligated the partnership to furnish necessary labor, tools, and equipment, and acquire necessary surface rights. The owner reserved an option to buy all coal the partnership mined at a mutually agreed-to price. The contract was cancelable upon 30 days' notice.

Read the full summary

Petitioners, operating as a partnership, strip mined coal under a lease agreement and mining contract with the owner of the mineral rights. The agreement described certain named coal seams and obligated the partnership to furnish necessary labor, tools, and equipment, and acquire necessary surface rights. The owner reserved an option to buy all coal the partnership mined at a mutually agreed-to price. The contract was cancelable upon 30 days' notice. Held, petitioners did not acquire an economic interest in the coal in place and they were not entitled to take depletion deduction under section…

1Opinion of the Court

J. Shelton Bolling and Jane Bolling, et al., Petitioners, 1 v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Bolling v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 89505, 89506, 89507, 89508

United States Tax Court

37 T.C. 754; 1962 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 211;

January 16, 1962, Filed

Decisions will be entered under Rule 50.

Petitioners, operating as a partnership, strip mined coal under a lease agreement and mining contract with the owner of the mineral rights. The agreement described certain named coal seams and obligated the partnership to furnish necessary labor, tools, and equipment, and acquire necessary surface…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Palmer v. BenderSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Commissioner v. Southwest Exploration Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Helvering v. Bankline Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Parsons v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. United States v. James C. And Helen M. Stallard, and Dewey H. And Geneva StallardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API