Legal Opinion

People v. Adams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 14, 1992No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Ford, 66 NY2d 428, 437), we conclude that it is legally sufficient to support defendant’s conviction of conspiracy in the second degree, criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495).

Defendant contends that County Court erred in refusing to instruct the jury that prosecution witness James Fuller was an accomplice whose testimony required…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. People v. ConaNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. People v. LawrenceNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. People v. OrtizNew York Court of Appeals · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. ClevelandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. People v. SageNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. People v. HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. People v. BonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. People v. MosesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API