Arkansas State Highway Comm'n v. Mahan
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George Rose Smith, Justice.
This is an action by the highway commission to condemn two strips of land lying on opposite sides of a street in Damascus and totaling sixteen hundredths of an acre. The jury fixed the landowners’ compensation at $12,900. In the view we take we need consider only two of the appellant’s three points for reversal.
First, the landowners subpoenaed two witnesses, Gray and Sandlin, but did not use them at the trial. On the day before the case was tried an attorney of record for the highway department filed a motion, as attorney for Gray, asking that the subpoena directed…
2Cited by5 opinions
- State v. DavisHawaii Supreme Court · 1972
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. BradfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- Jim Paws v. EQUALIZATION BD. OF GARLANDSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. ScottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- Arkansas State Highway Department v. BusbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972