Franklin v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Judge.
This is a writ of' certiorari to review the findings and award of the respondent Industrial Commission which held that the average monthly wage of the petitioner at the time of the injury was $120 per month.
The petitioner contends that the award and findings in question was not a final award and did not become res judicata because the calculation was illegal and beyond the Commission’s jurisdictional power as the result of a mistake or clerical error in determining the average monthly wage. The petitioner, not being represented by counsel was unaware of the consequences of his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hamer v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Martin v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Mickelson v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Bierman v. Magma Copper CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Garrard v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Phoenix Cotton Pickery v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Floyd Hartshorn Plastering Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Taylor v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Riggins v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969