Legal Opinion

Riggins v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 30, 1969No. 1 CA-IC 230PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOLLOY, Judge.

We are here concerned with whether the respondent-Commission properly determined that the petitioner-workman has sustained no permanent disability as the result of an industrial accident and whether it erred in fixing his average monthly wage. A defense of res judicata is presented as to the latter.

On July 15, 1966, the petitioner sustained a back injury while performing the duties of his employment by American Linen Supply Company, the respondent-employer. A claim for benefits was made to the respondent-Commission in normal course, and on October 14, 1966, the Commission issued…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Butler v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Morris v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Mickelson v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  4. Theoharidi v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  5. Talley v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wiley v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Floyd Hartshorn Plastering Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  3. Altamirano v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  4. Zapien v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API