Riggins v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
MOLLOY, Judge.
We are here concerned with whether the respondent-Commission properly determined that the petitioner-workman has sustained no permanent disability as the result of an industrial accident and whether it erred in fixing his average monthly wage. A defense of res judicata is presented as to the latter.
On July 15, 1966, the petitioner sustained a back injury while performing the duties of his employment by American Linen Supply Company, the respondent-employer. A claim for benefits was made to the respondent-Commission in normal course, and on October 14, 1966, the Commission issued…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Butler v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1937
- Morris v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1956
- Mickelson v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Theoharidi v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Talley v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wiley v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Floyd Hartshorn Plastering Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Altamirano v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Zapien v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970