Legal Opinion
Town of Orangetown v. Gorsuch
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 26, 1982No. 81 Civ. 1147PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
OWEN, District Judge.
Defendant moves to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a claim. Except as to plaintiff’s third claim for relief, defendant’s motion is denied. As to plaintiff’s third claim, defendant’s motion is granted.
Plaintiff, the Town of Orangetown (“Orangetown”), is a municipality in Rockland County. A sewage treatment plant is located there. By this suit for declaratory and injunctive relief, plaintiff seeks to prevent the expansion of that plant.
Plaintiff has named as defendants in this action a number of local, state, and federal parties who play…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- In Re Multidistrict Vehicle Air Pollution M.D.L. No. 31. State of California v. Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., Robert Morgan v. Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., City of Philadelphia v. Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., State of New York v. Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., City of New York v. Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., City and County of Denver v. American Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Town of Orangetown v. GorsuchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Town of Orangetown v. GorsuchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Town of Orangetown v. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Town of Orangetown v. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984