Legal Opinion
Howeisen v. Chapman
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 18, 1924No. 24,169PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGause, J.
This is a proceeding to establish a drain, commenced by a petition filed in the court below.
Commissioners were appointed to view the proposed work and make report thereon. This report was filed on February 6, 1922.
Appellants’ lands had been named in the petition as affected and they had been given notice thereof, and their lands were assessed as benefited in said report.
On February 18, 1922, appellants filed their several remonstrances to the report, as provided by §6143 Burns’ Supp. 1921, being the amendatory act of 1917, Acts 1917 p. 292. This statute provides that, “Upon the making of such…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- American Tobacco Co. v. StricklingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
- English v. DickeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Womack v. McahrenIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
- Yocum v. First National Bank of BrazilIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- State ex rel. Evans v. McGinnisIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. TinklenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- State Ex Rel. Putnam v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- City of Indianapolis v. Stutz Motor Car Co. of AmericaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
- Park & Tilford Import Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
- United States v. TinklenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.