Phillip Alfonso Espinoza v. Rollie R. Rogers, Colorado State Public Defender
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Per curiam
This is a federal civil rights action brought by plaintiff Espinoza against the defendants in their capacities as attorneys for the Colorado Public Defender’s Office. See 42 U.S.C. § 1983; 28 U.S.C. § 1343. Espinoza claims that he was denied due process and equal protection of the law because the defendants grossly mishandled and neglected legal matters which he had requested that they prosecute.
Specifically, Espinoza alleges numerous instances of the different defendants passing his legal work off to each other without taking any action. Further, he alleges that despite his numerous…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jones v. HopperCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- John Charles Thomas v. Harry R. Howard, EsquireCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Peake v. County of Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- United States Ex Rel. Wood v. BlackerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1971
3Cited by26 opinions
- Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hall v. QuillenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
- Spring v. ConstantinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- John Anthony Housand v. Maxwell HeimanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Earl Robinson v. John E. BergstromCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.