Legal Opinion

Earl Robinson v. John E. Bergstrom

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 13, 1978No. 76-1620PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Per curiam

Earl Robinson appeals from an order dismissing his civil rights complaint brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court found that the defendant was not acting under color of state law when he allegedly violated the constitutional rights of the plaintiff. Accordingly, no jurisdiction was found to exist under § 1983. Although defendant-appellee appeared and testified in the district court, he has not filed a responsive pleading in this appeal. Therefore the appeal, by order of this Court, 1 is considered without oral argument pursuant to Circuit Rule 8(c) and Rule 2, Fed.R. App.P.

Earl…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Gibson v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  3. Barbara Monsky, for Herself and on Behalf of All Women Similarly Situated v. Honorable Howard J. MoraghanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  4. Hall v. QuillenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
  5. Gibson v. The City Of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API