Legal Opinion

State v. Van Black

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 5, 1987No. 14514PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUS, Judge.

The defendant was charged with having committed arson in the second degree by burning his own house. § 569.050. The principal evidence presented by the state was the testimony of the defendant’s accomplices, Danny Warden and Arthur Clu-bine. A jury accepted their testimony and found the defendant guilty. In view of that verdict, “[i]n reviewing a contention that the evidence was insufficient to establish the crime charged, we accept as true all of the evidence favorable to the state, including all favorable inferences drawn from the evidence, and disregard all evidence and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. WoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. State v. ShepardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  3. State v. HarlstonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. State v. RossMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. State v. MenardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. DulanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. State v. CannonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. State v. CoxMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. State v. JacksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API