Cardona v. Metro Dade Transit Agency
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SHEVIN, Judge.
Plaintiff Jose Cardona appeals a final judgment in defendants’ favor. We reverse.
Prior to commencement of the evi-dentiary portion of the trial, Cardona and all the defendants entered into a “high-low” agreement: regardless of the jury’s verdict, Cardona’s maximum recovery would be $100,000; the minimum would be $15,000. For purposes of the agreement, defendants were willing to concede one percent liability.
After a jury verdict in defendants’ favor, the court refused to enforce the agreement and entered an “Order Disapproving High-Low Stipulation” essentially finding that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Booth v. Mary Carter Paint CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Ward v. OchoaSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- Dosdourian v. CarstenSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- 27th Avenue Gulf Service Center v. SmellieDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Oakwood Hills Co. v. Horacio Toledo, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gulf Industries, Inc. v. NairDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007