Legal Opinion

Cardona v. Metro Dade Transit Agency

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 9, 1996No. 96-528PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SHEVIN, Judge.

Plaintiff Jose Cardona appeals a final judgment in defendants’ favor. We reverse.

Prior to commencement of the evi-dentiary portion of the trial, Cardona and all the defendants entered into a “high-low” agreement: regardless of the jury’s verdict, Cardona’s maximum recovery would be $100,000; the minimum would be $15,000. For purposes of the agreement, defendants were willing to concede one percent liability.

After a jury verdict in defendants’ favor, the court refused to enforce the agreement and entered an “Order Disapproving High-Low Stipulation” essentially finding that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Booth v. Mary Carter Paint CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  2. Ward v. OchoaSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  3. Dosdourian v. CarstenSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  4. 27th Avenue Gulf Service Center v. SmellieDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  5. Oakwood Hills Co. v. Horacio Toledo, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gulf Industries, Inc. v. NairDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API