Legal Opinion

Scofield v. O'Connor

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 1, 1957No. 16253PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.

One of several appeals1 from judgments entered in favor of taxpayers, after Caldwell’s case2 and before Hawn’s case3 had been decided here, this appeal presents the single question whether, in the light of those cases, a transaction involving oil payments carved out of royalty interests was, as claimed by the taxpayer and found by the trial court, a sale of a capital asset, or was, as claimed by the commissioner an anticipatory assignment of income.

*66Making no attack upon Caldwell, in-fact conceding in oral argument that it was correctly decided, appellant’s whole effort…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Helvering v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Corn Products Refining Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Harrison v. SchaffnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Helvering v. EubankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Scofield v. O'connorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API