Legal Opinion
Grayson Ex Rel. Estate of Grayson v. Ross
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 26, 2007No. 04-3577PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
BEAM, Circuit Judge.
In our prior opinion in this case, Grayson v. Ross, 454 F.3d 802 (8th Cir.2006), we summarized all facts and related procedural and legal rulings relevant to this appeal. We repeat them here only as necessary. We fully addressed every issue arising under the United States Constitution and redressable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Using the same factual assertions, however, plaintiff Grayson, on behalf of her deceased spouse Daniel, a pretrial detainee, also advanced a claimed violation of the Constitution of the State of Arkansas, redressable under the Arkansas Civil Rights Act…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Grayson v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Shepherd v. Washington CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Burlington Northern Railroad Company v. Peter Kmezich Wayne Schoening Kristine Schoening Arthur Sieck, Jr. And Diane SieckCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Williams v. Arkansas Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
3Cited by1 opinion
- Grayson v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007