Legal Opinion

Burlington Northern Railroad Company v. Peter Kmezich Wayne Schoening Kristine Schoening Arthur Sieck, Jr. And Diane Sieck

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 27, 1995No. 94-1678PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

The defendants, Peter Kmezich, Wayne Sehoening, Kristine Schoening, Arthur Sieck, Jr., and Diane Sieck (the landowners), appeal from findings of fact and conclusions of law entered against them and in favor of the plaintiff, Burlington Northern Railroad Company. The issue in this ease is whether Iowa law extinguishes a railroad’s property interest in a right-of-way when a railroad “abandons” a railroad line for interstate-commerce purposes pursuant to the Interstate Commerce Act, but continues to use the line for other railroad purposes. The District Court 1…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. MacErich Real Estate Co. v. City of AmesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  4. The Medical Protective Company v. Fletcher BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  2. Burgess v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  3. McClurg Family Farm, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  4. Ali Haghighi, Doing Business as International Radio Network v. Russian-American Broadcasting Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  5. Grayson Ex Rel. Estate of Grayson v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API