Legal Opinion

General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 23, 1930No. Docket No. 7065PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

Petitioner is the insurance carrier for Raymond G. Osborne, who was the employer of Hazel Farrell in the employer’s chemical laboratory. Pursuant to application made by the employee the Commission in due course made its award,' based upon a finding that the injury of which she complained was proximately caused by her employment and was a direct result of exposure to the fumes of hydrochloric acid, ammonia and acetic acid in a sunless unventilated basement room; that the injury caused temporary total disability from December 31, 1924, continuing indefinitely. This award' was dated May 8, 1925.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rolland v. PorterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. William Simpson Construction Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hines v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Hardwell v. St. Louis Smelting & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Cowan v. George W. Kerford Quarry Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Sweeney v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Guarantee Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API