Legal Opinion

Stratton v. Drumm

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided February 23, 1978No. Civ. H-77-545PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

BLUMENFELD, District Judge.

This action is brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3), and under the Declaratory Judgments Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, 2202, to prevent the Town of East Hartford, Connecticut, from enforcing an amendment to its Massage Parlor Ordinance, East Hartford Code of Ordinances § 12-60(a), (c), which forbids massagists to administer massages to persons of the opposite sex. 1 The plaintiffs are operators and female employees of two massage parlors licensed under the ordinance. Defendants include the town, the mayor, the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Hicks v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,041 Sonesta International Hotels Corporation v. Wellington AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. James O. Pollard, Etc. v. Lila Cockrell, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Hilbers v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. MRM, INC. v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  4. Wigginess Inc. v. FruchtmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
  5. Cherry v. KochNew York Supreme Court · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API