Phoebe Dacha v. Medical Board of California and Reji Varghese
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 PHOEBE DACHA, No. 2:25-cv-3122 DAD AC PS 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER and 13 MEDICAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIA FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and REJI VARGHESE, 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se, and the case was accordingly referred to the 18 undersigned for pretrial purposes by E.D. Cal. 302(c)(21). Plaintiff has filed a request for leave 19 to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), and has submitted the affidavit required by that statute. See 20 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The motion…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.