Legal Opinion

Cahill v. Baird

California Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1903No. S.F. No. 2498PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.

The plaintiff, as assignee of ¡N". H. Hurdr an attorney at law, brought this action to recover the sum of fifteen hundred dollars, alleged to be due the plaintiff’s said, assignor for professional services rendered the defendant. The case was tried by a jury and a verdict rendered in the-sum of nine hundred and twenty-five dollars, for which judgment was entered. The defendant thereupon moved for a. new trial, which being denied, this appeal is taken from the-order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

The grounds urged for reversal are: Misconduct of the-jury; erroneous remarks made by…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. RuefCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  2. In Re Estate of DeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Skinner v. HornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Jones v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API