Legal Opinion
In re T.L.L.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 13, 1999No. 96-FS-470PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWELB, Associate Judge:
Following a bench trial, T.L.L., a juvenile,1 was found guilty of armed robbery. On appeal, he contends that the trial judge erred by denying T.L.L.’s motion to suppress identification evidence. More particularly, T.L.L. claims that the police lacked reasonable articulable suspicion to detain him for purposes of a show-up identifica*337tion by the complaining witness. In light of the limited evidence presented by the District at the hearing on T.L.L.’s motion, we are compelled to reverse.
I
THE EVIDENCE
At the motions hearing, which was held on February 2,1996, the only…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Umanzor v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Bennett v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Ellis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Henson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Milline v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.