Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Koster v. Charter Communications, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 2015No. WD 78258PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMark D. Pfeiffer, Presiding Judge

Appellant-Relator, Missouri Attorney General Chris Foster (“the AG”), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Cole County, Missouri (“trial court”), declaring that the Civil Investigative Demands (“CIDs”) issued to Respondents by the AG were not authorized by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2701 et seq. (“ECPA”), and were thus not enforceable. Because we conclude that the CIDs were “administrative subpoenas” contemplated by the ECPA and did not violate Respondents’ constitutional rights of privacy, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and enter the judgment…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Invention Submission CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  3. Nicolai v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  4. United States v. Ronald P. MarkwoodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  5. Petition of Gold Bond Stamp CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dimetrious Woods v. Missouri Board of Probation and ParoleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Kevin E. Riley v. Missouri Department of CorrectionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. State of Delaware, Department of Finance v. Univar, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API