State v. Anderson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Birdsong, Presiding Judge.
The State has taken a direct appeal under OCGA § 5-7-1 of the trial court’s order excluding evidence obtained by electronic surveillance because the evidence later was the subject of an unauthorized publication. Anderson and other co-defendants were allegedly involved in a bookmaking/gambling operation. The State properly obtained authorization to conduct electronic surveillance of the defendants’ telephones and allegedly obtained information showing that Anderson and the others were participating in unlawful gambling operations. During the investigation, a DeKalb…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Vansant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Ledesma v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Waller v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- State v. StrickmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996