Legal Opinion

Kocjancich v. Bridges

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 13, 1981No. 79-2084PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE SULLIVAN

delivered the opinion of the court:

Defendants Ronald R. Bridges (Bridges) and Wide Scope Personnel, Inc. (Wide Scope) appeal from the entry of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action brought under the Franchise Disclosure Act (the Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 121½, par. 701 et seq.). They contend that the trial court erred (1) in granting judgment on the issue of damages (a) because a genuine question of triable fact existed as to defendants’ right to restitution as provided in the Act and (b) because the motion had been previously denied and no…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. LaMonte v. City of BellevilleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  2. Martin Investors, Inc. v. Vander BieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Shockley v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. Cuthbert v. StempinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Littrell v. Coats Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Communications Maintenance, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Blankenship v. Dialist International Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Vitkauskas v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. Implement Service, Inc. v. Tecumseh Products Co.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1989
  5. P & W Supply Co. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API