Legal Opinion
Jimenez v. Duran
District Court, N.D. Iowa
Decided October 20, 2003No. C 01-3068-MWBPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING THE PARTIES’ CROSS-MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BENNETT, Chief Judge.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
/. INTRODUCTION. 981
A. Procedural Background. 981
B. Factual Background. 982
II. LEGAL ANALYSIS. 983
A. Standards For Summarg Judgment . 983
B. Arguments Of The Parties. 983
C. The FLSA And The “Agriculture” Exemption. 984
1. General principles. 984
2. The “Hollg Farms” analgsis. 985
3. The “Hollg Farms analysis” in this case. 985
a. Were the defendants engaged in “primary” agriculture? 985
b. Were the plaintiffs engaged in “secondary” agriculture? 988
i. Pertinent…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Phil Quick v. Donaldson Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Michael Aucutt v. Six Flags Over Mid-America, Inc., a Missouri Corporation in Good Standing, Equal Employment Advisory Council, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Holly Farms Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Bowie v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bills v. Cactus Family Farms, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2020