Allen v. United States
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
In this Indian tribal rights action, defendants move to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. Plaintiffs move for summary judgment. This order follows full briefing and oral argument. For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motion to dismiss is Granted. Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is Denied as Moot.
STATEMENT
This litigation arises out of a request by 43 individuals, each allegedly possessing a one-half or more degree of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Charles H. CAHILL; Aniko Der Cahill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Dugan v. RankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Thornhill Publishing Company, Inc. v. General Telephone & Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- AL Otro Lado, Inc. v. NielsenDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018