Legal Opinion

United States v. Kemp & Assocs., Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 31, 2018No. 17-4148PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

*1268 It is axiomatic that federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. See, e.g. , Dutcher v. Matheson , 733 F.3d 980 , 984 (10th Cir. 2013). Bounded first by the strictures of Article III and further by the limits of statutory jurisdiction given to us by Congress, we are powerless to rule on even meritorious questions that lie beyond our purview.

This appeal presents a clean lesson in the import of such jurisdictional restraint. Of the two questions presented for our review, the first-whether the district court correctly dismissed the criminal indictment at issue as…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Grunewald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. National Society of Professional Engineers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. ChavarriaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025
  2. United States v. PeckCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025
  3. Brown v. JBS USA Food CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2025
  4. Brown v. JBS USA Food CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2023
  5. Brown v. JBS USA Food CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API