Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Whitney & Marsh, Ltd.
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided October 30, 1905PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Exceptions prom Circuit Court, Eirst Circuit.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
HARTWELL, J.
The action was brought upon the defendant’s indorsement of two promissory notes of the Honolulu and Hawaiian Paper Co., Limited, payable in the sums of $500 and $1,000 respectively to the order of Eitzgerald Trunk Co. The defendant’s demurrer that the complaint does not show a cause of action, is based on its claim that the complaint shows it indorsed the notes for the accommodation of the maker which, it is contended by the *109defendant, was beyond its corporate powers. Tbe demurrer, having been overruled, the case comes upon the defendant’s interlocutory bill…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- California Bank v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Ward v. JoslinSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Martin v. Niagara Falls Paper Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- National Park Bank v. German-American Mutual Warehousing & Security Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Lyon, Potter & Co. v. First Nat. Bank of Sioux CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gardiner v. HolcombCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- McQueen v. First National BankArizona Supreme Court · 1929
- In re Prospect Leasing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. Realty Development Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1933
- Porter v. Kapiolani Estate, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1907