Legal Opinion

B. B. Chemical Co. v. Cataract Chemical Co.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided October 13, 1941No. 2218PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, District Judge.

The plaintiff excepts to the taxation of certain costs by the defendant, and also seeks to tax a bill of costs against the defendant. The Circuit Court of Appeals allowed costs to the defendant. Those were allowed to the party seeking review pursuant to Rule 29 of the Rules of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. That court allowed costs as to a prevailing party.

Costs in an equity suit have long been within the discretion of the court. Section 4919, R.S. 35 U.S.C.A. § 67, does not make the imposition of costs obligatory. It has no application here except the inference…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. James Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1937

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Scientific Holding Company, Ltd. v. Plessey IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  2. Kalkowski v. Ronco, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1976
  3. Scaramucci v. Universal Manufacturing Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API