Legal Opinion
Scaramucci v. Universal Manufacturing Co.
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Decided October 8, 1964No. Civ. A. No. 8305PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEN C. DAWKINS, Jr., Chief Judge.
RULING ON OBJECTIONS TO BILL OF COSTS
After judgment was rendered in favor of defendant in this patent infringement action,1 plaintiff has filed objections to the costs bill submitted by defendant.
Plaintiff’s first objection is as to the allowance of $2,797.46 for expert witness fees, mileage, and subsistence for defendant’s expert, Fishleigh. It often has been held that fees of expert witnesses called by a party in his own behalf are not taxable as costs in excess of the statutory witness fees. Henkel v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Ry. Co., 284 U.S.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Henkel v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Edwin Green, Jr., as Administrator of the Estate of Edwin Green, Deceased, and Mary Green v. American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Specialty Equipment & MacHinery Corp. v. Zell Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. Republic Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- William C. Euler v. Nancy Lee Waller, a Minor, by Her Guardian, Robert Lewis McCollarCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- H. C. Baxter & Bro. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1968
- West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991