Plue v. State

OPINION

MATTINGLY, Judge

Richard W. Plue appeals the revocation of his probation. He raises two issues which we restate as: 1) Whether the trial court erred in denying Plue’s motion to suppress evidence allegedly obtained during an unreasonable search and seizure; and 2) Whether the trial court erred by denying Plue’s motion to suppress a custodial statement he made to the police.

We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On July 15, 1996, Plue entered a plea of guilty to driving while intoxicated, a Class D felony, and was sentenced to three years in jail. The trial court suspended Plue’s entire…