Legal Opinion

Haynes Stellite Co. v. Chesterfield

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided October 23, 1925No. 482PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, District Judge.

This is an aetion for alleged infringement of letters patent issued to Elwood Haynes on April 1, 1913, No. 1,057,423, for “metal alloy,” on an application filed July 20, 1912.

Preliminary to the decision, I desire to put on the record observance of the death of the patentee during the trial of this lawsuit, During the days of the contest, involving al- • leged infringement of this patent, the man who secured the patent left the battle of business and life here with us. Elwood Haynes, the patentee in this ease, was a man who had written his name very high and very big,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. White v. DunbarSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Gill v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Fuller v. YentzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Howe MacHine Co. v. National Needle Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Pittsburgh Iron & Steel Foundries Co. v. Seaman-Sleeth Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chesterfield v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  2. Chesterfield v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  3. Haynes Stellite Co. v. ChesterfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
  4. Haynes v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API