Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Service Commission
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WOLFE, Chief Justice.
The Commission commenced this proceeding to inquire into the reasonableness of the differences between the schedule of rates for intrastate toll service and the schedule for Long Lines interstate toll service. It found that the existing differences were unwarranted and discriminatory. It also found that there was no reasonable basis for any differences between the two schedules and ordered the schedule of intrastate rates reduced to the level of Long Lines rate. Mountain States objected to the new rate, not on the grounds that it was inherently unreasonable, but because…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Interstate Com. Commiss. v. B. & O. RAILROADSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- American Express Co. v. South Dakota Ex Rel. CaldwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1945
- Mountain States Legal Foundation v. Utah Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1981
- Utah Department of Business Regulation, Division of Public Utilities v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1945
- Mountain States Legal Foundation v. Utah Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.