Legal Opinion

Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Service Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1944No. 6557PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Chief Justice.

The Commission commenced this proceeding to inquire into the reasonableness of the differences between the schedule of rates for intrastate toll service and the schedule for Long Lines interstate toll service. It found that the existing differences were unwarranted and discriminatory. It also found that there was no reasonable basis for any differences between the two schedules and ordered the schedule of intrastate rates reduced to the level of Long Lines rate. Mountain States objected to the new rate, not on the grounds that it was inherently unreasonable, but because…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Interstate Com. Commiss. v. B. & O. RAILROADSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. American Express Co. v. South Dakota Ex Rel. CaldwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Mountain States Legal Foundation v. Utah Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Utah Department of Business Regulation, Division of Public Utilities v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Mountain States Legal Foundation v. Utah Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API