Legal Opinion

Rosetto v. Miller

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1927Published

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

It appears that on August 1, 1924, the plaintiff and defendant entered into a written agreement reciting that, whereas the cattle of the defendant Miller ■ had entered upon the land of plaintiff Rosetto and destroyed some growing crops, they agreed to arbitrate the amount of damages; each party was to pick one disinterested man as an arbitrator to examine and estimate the damages and in case they could not agree, then the parties so selected were to pick a third person.

Plaintiff alleges that thereafter he selected D. Garribo and the defendant selected Joe Reghitto as arbitrators ; that they…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sun Dial Ranch v. May Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Sigel v. Portland Ry. L. & P. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Watts v. Spokane, P. & S. Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Taggart v. HunterOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Warren v. DinwoodieOregon Supreme Court · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API