Legal Opinion

Warren v. Dinwoodie

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1918PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From Multnomah: Bobert Gr. Morrow, Judge. The defendants, John Dinwoodie, N. A. Hoffard and David Clark, appeal from a judgment against them and defendant C. A. Parvin for the sum of $677.50 for labor performed and personal property sold and delivered to defendants by plaintiff. C. A. Parvin did not appeal. The cause was tried by the court without the intervention of a jury. Findings of fact and conclusions of law were made and the judgment was based thereon.

Read the full summary

From Multnomah: Bobert Gr. Morrow, Judge. The defendants, John Dinwoodie, N. A. Hoffard and David Clark, appeal from a judgment against them and defendant C. A. Parvin for the sum of $677.50 for labor performed and personal property sold and delivered to defendants by plaintiff. C. A. Parvin did not appeal. The cause was tried by the court without the intervention of a jury. Findings of fact and conclusions of law were made and the judgment was based thereon. It appears that in March, 1914, one Harris was in possession of a ranch in Gilliam County, Oregon, known as the “French Charley Place”…

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

It is claimed upon the part of the appealing defendants that after the purchase they made *344a contract with C. A. Parvin for the sale of their interest in the ranch to him and that he alone was responsible to plaintiff. This deal, however, was never fully consummated. They also claim that there was no testimony showing that Parvin was authorized to act for the other defendants.

1, 2. Where a cause is tried by the court without the intervention of a jury the findings of fact made by the court are deemed a verdict and may be set-aside only for the same reasons: Section 159, L. O. L.; U. S.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Flegel v. KossOregon Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Astoria Railroad v. KernOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Doolittle v. Pacific Coast Safe & Vault WorksOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Clackamas Southern Ry. Co. v. VickOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Norman v. EllisOregon Supreme Court · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. KendrickOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Burke MacHinery Co. v. CopenhagenOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Cannon v. Farmers' Union Grain AgencyOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Brownell v. HeitmanOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Nibley v. DelahuntOregon Supreme Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API