Bank of America, N.A. v. Reyes-Toledo.
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
POLLACK, J.
This ease raises issues of standing and appellate jurisdiction that pertain to foreclosure proceedings. We consider whether a foreclosing plaintiff seeking summary judgment must prove it had standing to foreclose on the homeowner’s property at the commencement of the lawsuit to be entitled to foreclosure of the subject property. We also determine the extent of appellate jurisdiction over interlocutory orders leading up to a foreclosure decree.
I. BACKGROUND
The subject of the foreclosure proceedings is the home of Grisel Reyes-Toledo (“Homeowner”). On September…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. SchwartzwaldOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- U.S. Bank, N.A. v. CollymoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- McLean v. JP Morgan Chase Bank National Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Hawaii Community Federal Credit Union v. KekaHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
- Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & WrightHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- U.S. Bank N.A. v. Mattos.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017
- Lizza v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- 1250 Oceanside, LLC v. BucklesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2017
- The Bank of New York Mellon v. Daniel T. QuinnSupreme Court of Vermont · 2025
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Behrendt.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.