Legal Opinion

Ming v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1997No. 71288PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRANE, Presiding Judge.

Railroad employee filed a FELA action against railroad for damages for injuries she sustained when a file cabinet fell on her while working for railroad at a General Motors Corporation office. Railroad filed a motion for summary judgment asserting that it did not have actual or constructive notice of any defect or unsafe condition with respect to the file cabinet and therefore the employee’s injury was not reasonably foreseeable. Employee did not file a response under Rule 74.04(c)(2) to railroad’s motion. The trial court granted railroad’s motion for summary judgment.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Trotter's Corp. v. Ringleader Restaurants, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Qualls v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  4. Turner v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Peltzman v. BeachnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Autry Morlan Chevrolet, Cadillac, Inc. v. RJF Agencies, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Johnson v. Missouri Board of Nursing AdministratorsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Parish v. Novus Equities Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Ming v. General Motors Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Morgan v. Union Pacific RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API