Legal Opinion

United States v. Bonilla

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 18, 2009No. 08-12127PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAY, Circuit Judge:

Mario Alberto Simbaqueba-Bonilla (“Bonilla”) appeals the district court’s imposition of a 108 month sentence. Bonilla pled guilty to 16 counts of conspiracy, access device fraud, identity theft, and aggravated identity theft. On appeal, Bonilla asserts that his plea was constitutionally invalid and that the subsequent sentence imposed was unreasonable and therefore should be vacated.

Specifically, Bonilla asserts that (i) the plea is invalid because the court failed to advise him of the consequences of his plea; (ii) the indictment was multiplicitous and violates the double…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  4. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. State v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  2. United States v. BarringtonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. Palomino GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. McGarityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. DoeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API