Legal Opinion

Tennessee Valley Bank v. Aaron

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 16, 1925No. 6 Div. 318PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

The bill of complaint sufficiently alleges every fact necessary to establish a lien in favor of Winston county upon the lands of R. T. Thornton, by reason of his breaches of his official bond. Section 1491, Code of 1907; section 2603, Code 1923. It also sufficiently alleges every fact necessary to establish complainant’s right to subrogation to the lien of the county, by reason of his payment of the judgment recovered by the county against Thornton and the several sureties on his bond. Cummings v. May, 110 Ala. 479, 20 So. 307; Randolph v. Brown, 115 Ala. 677, 22 So. 524; Singleton v. U. S.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Watts v. Eufaula National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  2. Singleton v. United States F. & G. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  3. Cummings v. MaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  4. Randolph v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cowart v. AaronSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Harbin v. AaronSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. Roebuck v. RobertsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API