Legal Opinion

People v. Grucci

Suffolk County District Court

Decided May 2, 2001Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Emily Pines, J.

Ordered that the branch of defendant’s motion seeking to dismiss pursuant to GPL 170.30 and 170.35 is granted for the reasons set forth below. The remainder of the motion is denied as academic.

Defendant herein, Joseph J. Grucci, has been charged with violating Environmental Conservation Law § 13-0311 (7). That statutory subdivision states that, “No person shall take shell*585fish in any quantity during the time that such person’s digger’s permit privileges have been revoked or suspended.” The factual portion of the accusatory instrument filed in this matter…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sequim Bay Canning Co. v. BuggeWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  2. State v. Trustees of the Freeholders & CommonaltyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Sloup v. Town of IslipNew York Supreme Court · 1974
  4. In re the Fishway in Dam Crossing the West Branch of DelawareAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  5. People v. JohnsonLloyd Harbor Village Police Court · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API