In re Golkin

OPINION OF THE COURT

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by this Court on September 16, 1970, and formerly maintained an office in Niagara Falls. On February 2, 1996, respondent was suspended *51from practice pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1022.19 (f) (2) (i) (a) on the ground that there was uncontroverted evidence that he was guilty of misconduct immediately threatening the public interest and on the further ground that he failed to respond to a judicial subpoena duces tecum (see, Matter of Golkin, 218 AD2d 375). The Grievance Committee has now filed a petition charging respondent with four…