In re Golkin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by this Court on September 16, 1970 and maintains an office in Niagara *376Falls. The Grievance Committee of the Eighth Judicial District has filed a motion pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1022.19 (f) (2) to suspend respondent from the practice of law pending the determination of disciplinary charges, based upon respondent’s default in responding to a judicial subpoena duces tecum and uncontroverted evidence of misconduct immediately threatening the public interest. The complaints allege, and the uncontroverted evidence submitted by…
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re GolkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996