Legal Opinion

In re Golkin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 2, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by this Court on September 16, 1970 and maintains an office in Niagara *376Falls. The Grievance Committee of the Eighth Judicial District has filed a motion pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1022.19 (f) (2) to suspend respondent from the practice of law pending the determination of disciplinary charges, based upon respondent’s default in responding to a judicial subpoena duces tecum and uncontroverted evidence of misconduct immediately threatening the public interest. The complaints allege, and the uncontroverted evidence submitted by…

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re GolkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API