Legal Opinion
Weidner v. Szostek
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided May 28, 1993No. 2-92-0982PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Quetsch
Plaintiffs, Vernon and Ronald Weidner, as successors in interest to Weidner Concrete Company, formerly doing business as Weidner Construction Company, filed a three-count complaint against defendants, Joseph Szostek et al., to recover damages for breach of contract. Defendants filed a counterclaim to recover damages also resulting from breach of contract. The trial court entered judgment, minus certain setoffs, against defendants in the amount of $25,922, plus costs. That amount was composed of $15,941 in prejudgment interest, $9,542.50 in attorney fees and $439 in costs. Defendants appeal…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kaiser v. MEPC American Properties, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- In Re Estate of CallahanIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
- Fuller v. JusticeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Spinelli v. Immanuel Lutheran Evangelical Congregation, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987
- Wilson v. WilsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Fletcher Hill, Inc. v. CrosbieSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- Xu Liu v. Price Waterhouse LLP and Computer Language Research, Inc., Defendants/third-Party v. Xiaomei Yang, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Pietrzyk v. Oak Lawn Pavilion, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- Sampson v. MiglinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- McCarthy v. DenkovskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.