Legal Opinion
Fletcher Hill, Inc. v. Crosbie
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided January 14, 2005No. 02-348PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.
¶ 1. This action arises out of the construction of a modular home by plaintiff Fletcher Hill, Inc. for defendant Susan Crosbie. Fletcher Hill appeals (1) the trial court’s denial of its request for attorney’s fees, and (2) the court’s determination of the rate of prejudgment interest. We affirm.
¶ 2. Crosbie entered into a construction contract with Fletcher Hill for construction and installation of her modular home. The contract contains a “late fee” provision which states that “[a]ll outstanding balances over 30 days due from date of invoice will be charged 2% per month interest plus…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ruckelshaus v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Szoboszlay v. GlessnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- Dj Painting, Inc. v. Baraw Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2001
- Union of Needletrades, Industrial and Textile Employees, Afl-Cio, Clc v. United States Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- De Witt v. Liberty Leasing Company of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- EBWS, LLC v. Britly Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- Lamell Lumber Corp. v. Newstress International, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- Lamell Lumber Corp. v. NEWSTRESS INTERN.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- Electric Man, Inc. v. CharosSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- Donald L. Sweet, Jr. and Preston L. Sweet v. Roy A. St. Pierre and Catherine St. Pierre d/b/a Woodlands FarmsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.