Legal Opinion

Desha v. Erwin

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 13, 1925PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hast, J.,

(after stating the facts). It is sought to uphold the judgment on the ground that the land in controversy formed as an accretion to the land belonging to the defendants and their grantors, and that the plaintiff, having no title to it, should not be allowed to maintain this action.

On the part of tlie plaintiff, it is contended that the land was originally a part of Big Island, and was cut off from the other land on Big Island by a sndden change in the main channel of White River in 1868 or I860. White River is a navigable stream, and it is the established rule that a riparian owner…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Co. v. StimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Doe ex dem. Phillips' Heirs v. PorterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1840
  3. Wallace v. DriverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
  4. Abbott v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  5. Yutterman v. GrierSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gibson v. PickettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  2. Goforth v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  3. Kimble v. WilleyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1951
  4. Dewey Portland Cement Co. v. Benton County Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  5. Swaim v. Stephens Production Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API