Legal Opinion

Mayer v. Ver Bryck

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1895No. 5366PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from the district court of Harlan county. Tried below before Gaslin, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

This was an action by Mayer .to recover for services alleged to have been performed for Yer Bryck as a real estate broker. There was a verdict and judgment for the defendant, a reversal of which is sought by the plaintiff.

The plaintiff requested the following instruction, which was refused: “If you find that defendant Yer Bryck re*222quested plaintiff Mayer to assist in the sale of defendant’s property, described in the petition of plaintiff, and that plaintiff Mayer did assist in said sale, even if plaintiff did not wholly procure said purchaser, still, if plaintiff Mayer, at the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Powder River Live Stock Co. v. LambNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Gregg v. LoomisNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
  3. West v. Van PeltNebraska Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dorrington v. PowellNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Reeves v. WatkinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Whitham v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API