Legal Opinion

West v. Van Pelt

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the district court for Douglas County. Tried below before Doane, J. cited: MoMillen v. Malloy, 10 Neb., 229; Parcell v. Me Comber, 11 Id., 210; Duncan v. Baker, 21 Kan., 99.

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Ch. J.

This action was brought in the district court of Douglas county by the plaintiff against the defendant upon a contract. On the trial of the cause the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant, and a motion for a new trial having been overruled, the action was dismissed. The cause of action is set forth in the amended petition as follows:

“Plaintiff, for his cause of action, says that the defendants are a copartnership doing business in said county under the firm name and style of Yan Pelt Brothers, said firm being composed of John and Jacob Yan Pelt; that on or about the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Duncan v. BakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
  2. McMillan v. MalloyNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Parcell v. McComberNebraska Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rickertsen v. CarskadonNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Mayer v. Ver BryckNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Morris Mills v. Denny Wiekhorst Excavating, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API