Legal Opinion

Hercules Glue Co. v. Littooy

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1941No. Civ. No. 11676PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOURSE, P.

In an appeal from an order made after final judgment in an action for specific performance the single question presented is whether, after a decree has become final and has been affirmed on appeal, the trial court *43has power and jurisdiction to modify it by adding conditions to those contained in the decree which the plaintiff is required to fulfill before the specific performance theretofore ordered shall become effective.

Plaintiff brought an action in equity for specific performance of a contract with defendant requiring the latter to assign to plaintiff a certain invention made by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Estate of GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Lankton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. O'Brien v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Los Angeles Auto Tractor Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Hercules Glue Co. v. LittooyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Mosk v. National Research Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Rynsburger v. Dairymen's Fertilizer Cooperative, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Lesser & Son v. SeymourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Barnes v. ChamberlainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Vallelunga v. GomesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API