Legal Opinion

Hart-Parr Co. v. Barkley

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 28, 1916No. 158PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Petition to Revise Order of the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Oklahoma; John H. Cotteral, Judge. In the matter of Julius Tuxhorn, bankrupt. Petition of the Hart-Parr Company, a corporation, against Adam Barkley and another, to revise an order of the District Court denying petitioner’s application to vacate the adjudication.

1Opinion of the Court

CARLAND, Circuit Judge.

[1] This is a petition to revise an order of the District Court of the Western District of Oklahoma, denying the application of the Hart-Parr Company, a creditor, to have the judgment of said court, which adjudicated Julius Tuxhorn an involuntary bankrupt, vacated and set aside. • As such an order is not appealable, it would seem that as to matters of law it may be reviewed by. a petition to revise, B-R Electric & Telephone Manufacturing Co. v. Ætna Life Insurance Co., 206 Fed. 885; 124 C. C. A. 545.

[2] The application to vacate the adjudication of bankruptcy alleged as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. B-R Electric & Telephone Mfg. Co. v. Ætna Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Chudnov v. Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  2. Hanna v. Brictson Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  3. In re De Camp Glass Casket Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
  4. Armstrong v. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
  5. Winston v. HoyneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1922

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API